16:22 EDB extends a RUB 1.27 billion loan facility for RG Brands Kazakhstan
15:52 EDB offers bonds underwritten by Kazkommerts Securities at KASE
19:36 EDB and the Global Infrastructure Hub sign a memorandum of understanding in Singapore
16:29 Dmitry Pankin: IFIs are important players in PPP syndicates
12:38 Trade between the EDB countries recovers in Q1 2017 (quarterly macro review)
20:44 Dmitry Pankin: Regional integration neutralises negative economic effects for landlocked countries
14:14 EDB acquires share in ASK, a concession company building Central Ring Road 3
13:59 EDB: Eurasian economic integration has gained practical content but may encounter stumbling blocks in the future (the report “Eurasian Economic Integration 2017”)
19:02 EDB provides a US $10 million loan facility to Belinvestbank for trade finance
13:50 Eurasian Development Bank accounts for the largest portion of investment finance approved by MDBs for the CIS countries in Q1 2017 (review)
14:00 Macroeconomic Review: Improvements in the global economy may accelerate growth in the EDB countries
EDB: Eurasian economic integration has gained practical content but may encounter stumbling blocks in the future (the report “Eurasian Economic Integration 2017”)
The EAEU’s integration agenda becomes increasingly specific: the union works systemically on non-tariff barriers, financial markets and free trade areas. However, mutual trade and investments remain weak and negotiations about new integration initiatives are cumbersome.
St. Petersburg, 18 May 2017. Eurasian economic integration has achieved meaningful results but its initial rapid progress has ended. This is proved, in particular, by difficulties in negotiating the Customs Code and the common market in medicines and medical goods. These were the two most important topics on the integration agenda in recent months, the consensus on which was hard to reach. These findings of Eurasian Development Bank’s (EDB) Centre for Integration Studies are presented in its report Eurasian Economic Integration 2017.
A number of potential effects of Eurasian economic integration remained non-fulfilled. In 2011-2012, when the Customs Union emerged, there were many talks about possible competition between jurisdictions. This could result in a flow of thousands of companies from one country to another, for example, in order to enjoy more favourable taxation. Five years later it is clear that businesses’ anchorage to their native countries occurred to be stronger. This is due to the state’s significant share in economy and still high non-tariff barriers.
Negative developments in mutual trade and investments persisted. However, the decline in these indicators was significantly lower in the EAEU countries than beyond. The report suggests that the EAEU acts as somewhat of a buffer against negative external shocks. The intra-union trade fell by 6.7% (although its physical volumes increased by 0.4%), compared to a drop of 12% in the EAEU’s foreign trade. The values of the EAEU’s mutual trade are still dependent on global hydrocarbon prices, although this correlation is weakening. The dynamics of mutual FDI was also negative, but better than in the CIS region as a whole. In 2015, the figure was 14.3% lower than in the peak 2012, while the mutual FDI stock of CIS countries declined by 25.8% over the same period. Meanwhile, the routine, however no less important, work on trade policies goes on.
The report states that a positive factor is that the efforts to reduce non-tariff protection of the EAEU markets have become systematic. An information portal titled The Functioning of Domestic Markets in the Eurasian Economic Union was launched. Its main objectives are to monitor barriers to mutual trade and gather feedback from businesses. In 2016, the EEC prepared the White Book (published in 2017) – a document summarising the existing barriers to the free movement of goods, services, capital and labour in the EAEU.
In 2016, the EAEU worked persistently on expanding its foreign economic ties. Free trade agreements with Egypt, Israel, India, Iran and Singapore are being considered. A common trade regime with Serbia is being devised. Negotiations are underway on a non-preferential agreement with China. Other potential partners include India, South Korea, Chile, Thailand and South Africa.
Current work on the EAEU’s trade and economic agreements
The report notes the emerging convergence of per capita incomes. Kazakhstan, Belarus and Armenia are catching up with Russia in terms of GDP per capita and are decreasing the gap by approximately 0.7-1.4 percentage points a year. The only country that lacked such dynamics was the Kyrgyz Republic.
Compliance with sustainable macroeconomic development criteria envisioned by the Treaty on the EAEU is a matter of concern. In 2016, all the member states had violations of some of the criteria. This is not critical to the EAEU in the short term, but would be a threat in the longer term.
Compliance with sustainable economic development criteria by the EAEU member countries in 2016
|Inflation (%, December-on-December)||-1,1||10,6||8,5||-0,5||5,4|
|Consolidated government budget deficit (% of GDP)||5,4||-2,1||2,9||4,0||3,0|
|Government debt (% of GDP)||51,5||41,8||19,7||61,8||11,9|
Note: The figures in red reflect deviations from the EAEU sustainable economic development criteria.
Source: national statistics agencies, EEC, calculations by the authors
EDB experts emphasise that EAEU development is not an abstract or theoretical issue. Eurasian integration is already affecting businesses and millions of people. Whether these processes (a common trade policy, free trade areas with dozens of partners all over the world, the lifting of the burden of non-tariff barriers, the functioning of the common labour market, and the convergence of macroeconomic policies) are successful or not is important to the long-term sustainable growth of the EAEU countries.
Main indicators of EAEU socio-economic development in 2016
|Growth in comparable prices (% year-on-year)||0,2||–2,6||1,0||3,8||–0,2||–0,1|
|in current prices (US $ billion)||10,8||48,1||128,1||5,8||1267,8||1460,5|
|PPP based (US $ billion)||26,6||165,4||460,7||21,0||3745,1||4418,7|
|PPP based per capita (US $)||8881,0||17496,5||25669,2||3467,3||26109,1||21288,3|
Source: national statistics agencies, IMF, EEC, calculations by the authors
Note: PPP – purchasing power parity
The report Eurasian Economic Integration 2017 is available online.
Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) is an international financial institution founded by Russia and Kazakhstan in January 2006 with the mission to facilitate the development of market economies, sustainable economic growth, and the expansion of mutual trade and other economic ties in its member states. EDB’s charter capital totals US $7 billion. The member states of the Bank are the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Tajikistan.
The Centre for Integration Studies is a specialist research centre of Eurasian Development Bank. The Centre organises research and prepares reports and recommendations on regional economic integration. It has published over 40 public reports over six years of its operation. Read more about the Centre’s projects and publications at http://www.eabr.org/e/research/centreCIS/projectsandreportsCIS/
EDB Media Centre:
+7 (727) 244 05 455, ext. 6147 (Almaty)
+7 (495) 645 04 455, ext. 2724 (Moscow)
18 May, 2017